Home > Opinions > Opinion: Why blaming social networking for riots misses the point

Opinion: Why blaming social networking for riots misses the point

Thursday, 25 August, 2011 Leave a comment Go to comments
BlackBerry Fwd

Not a cause but a symptom: Blackberry. Image by Marcos Sader via Flickr

Over the last couple of weeks we’ve seen virtually every talking head the mainstream media can lay their hands on – me included, to be fair – talking about the causes of the riots. They’ve blamed everything from the public spending cuts which started with this government taking office to the availability of social networking.

This, we are told, is the prime cause of all of the rioting and looting which hit Britain’s major cities a fortnight ago. I firmly disagree with this idea: why (literally) blame the messenger? The medium used for the message is not a problem, it is the message itself.

Less well informed commentators have been frantically blaming Twitter and Blackberry Messenger (BBM) for spreading information to rioters so they could avoid the police and attack areas that hadn’t been hit. I say this is nonsense; WL’s liveblogs were based entirely on information from Twitter and the only people I saw on there encouraging the rioters were people like Jody Macintyre, notorious for deliberately taking his wheelchair into the middle of a student riot. For potentially committing the criminal offence of inciting a riot, Macintyre was sacked from both the Guardian and the Independent. Virtually no-one “on the ground” was publicly encouraging others to smash up businesses and steal designer goods.

In my opinion the main cause of the riots was the sudden realisation that there was a power vacuum. When the peaceful demonstration in Tottenham got out of hand and descended into violence, the rioters there realised that the police were doing little or nothing to stop them. And it spread like wildfire.

Prominent police blogger Inspector Gadget took a straw poll of his readers the other day and the results were interesting. The majority of them believed that, in the days since Ian Tomlinson’s death (caused by his being struck with a police baton at the G20 protests) police constables are very likely to be hung out to dry for enforcing the law robustly. Whilst reporting on the riots, I noticed a real change in the levels of violence from Tuesday afternoon onwards – by midnight on Wednesday it was all over. Why?

The rolling news footage told the story. Instead of seeing police officers standing still and letting the rioters throw things at them, we were watching them charge forward and take control of the streets again. Within hours the riots had petered out.

I really do believe it is as simple as that: lack of firm action to contain the usual level of anti-police violence in certain areas of London led to rioters pushing the boundaries to their absolute limit. What we must do now is resist the latest attempts by politicians to shut down social networking sites during instances of public disorder. Instead, we must get them to concentrate on effective law enforcement in the less stable areas of London.

  1. Thursday, 25 August, 2011 at 2:01 PM

    The bottom line is police don’t have the same power they once did. Look at the recent protests up in Madrid this week gone, I’m not saying it’s right in fact the police were well over the top. However look how fast did they dispersed the crowd.

    Just like the World Cup years ago in Germany, they should have identified the trouble makes and quickly pulled them from the crowds. Although there were hundreds of looters, it will have been a minority few that started it.

  2. Adam Tippelt
    Thursday, 25 August, 2011 at 2:25 PM

    You’ve hit the nail on the head with this one Gaz. Police officers have come under far too much legislation that means they can’t lay a finger on anyone without risking prosecution. It’s the same with anyone in the public sector, like doctors for example – they refuse to treat a patient, they’d be sued (fair enough), but they treat a patient who then dies, and the doctor is still sued for malpractice. You can’t expect anyone to do they’re job if they’re handcuffed by bureaucracy.
    Once again it comes down to common sense being applied – if you’re stupid enough to behave in a way that requires forceful police action, then they should be able to throw everything at you that is required to desolve the situation as safely and efficiently as possible.

    The second a person engages in this sort of behaviour, it should be an automatic forfeit of their human rights regarding any actions taken in response by the police.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: