Home > News > Cameron’s plans for ‘Broken Britain’

Cameron’s plans for ‘Broken Britain’

Monday, 15 August, 2011 Leave a comment Go to comments

The Prime Minister has come under intense criticism today as he announced plans to fix what he has deemed Britain’s “broken society”.

Following the riots of last week, which left five people dead, David Cameron has urged Britain to find its moral compass. With thousands facing charges for violence and theft and at least £200 million in property losses, it has become a huge talking point for people nationwide. Cameron has said that senior ministers will be spending the next few weeks formulating new policies which will aim to reverse what he described as a country being dragged down by the laziness, irresponsibility and selfishness of its citizens.

Under a new scheme, all 16-year-olds will be called upon to do non-military national service as part of a new initiative designed to teach respect to an age group which is currently seen by some as lacking discipline. This echoes the German system which, up until recently, required all people from the age of 18 to undertake at least 9 months of military service.  The German military was founded in 1955, and conscription has been seen as critical to civil society in order to prevent a repeat of the way in which the Nazi party was able to manipulate professional soldiers in the 1930s. However, experts argue that it has prevented the modernisation of the German military.

According to Nation Master Statistics,  Germany boasts a crime rate of  7.6% (76.0 per 1,000 people) compared to Britain’s 8.56% (85.6 per 1000 people).  However, these kind of statistics are often better indicators of prevalence of law enforcement and willingness to report crime, than actual numbers of people committing offences. Still, there is a clear difference in crime rates between the two countries – although it remains to be seen whether this comes down to the German method of compulsory national service or whether it is simply a case of a more effective justice system. 

Labour leader, Ed Miliband, said that Mr Cameron is “reaching for shallow and superficial answers” and has once again called for a public inquiry into last week’s riots. He went on to accuse the Prime Minister of using “knee-jerking” claims which he is unlikely to follow through.

Nevertheless, the Prime Minister plans to push forward with efforts to better what he sees as ‘failing schools’ and pledged to speed up reforms to get more good schools in deprived areas. He pointed out that it was not just an underclass which is to blame for social ills; in his speech he claimed that “moral decline and bad behaviour is not limited to a few of the poorest parts of our society”.  He also stressed that the security crackdown had to be matched by efforts from the public in wanting to better themselves: “This must be a wake-up call for our country,” he said, going on to declare a “clear ambition that within the lifetime of this Parliament, we will turn around the lives of the 120,000 most troubled families in the country”.

His aims have come under scrutiny as he announced moves towards imposing a tougher approach to those who claim unemployment benefits; he also has laid out plans to end the “chilling effect” of the human rights culture in Britain along with the health and safety rules which he sees as ‘damaging’ to British society. Harking back to the original Conservative aims, Cameron went on to outline the importance of building stronger family units and suggested a new “family test” aimed at vetting government policies and ensuring they are well-suited to families. Finally, he pressed the matter of school reforms, promising to boost the standards of teaching as well as discipline within education establishments.

The National Citizen Scheme offers teenagers the chance to abseil and canoe, amongst other activities, as well as assist with various work schemes within the community. This controversial move is one which is likely to provoke intense debate within parliament in coming weeks, as well as fuelling further divides in public opinion towards the current government.

  1. Jayze
    Monday, 15 August, 2011 at 9:33 PM

    its a superficial response and it means decent and well behaved children are basically taking a punishment that this current generation are responsible for

  2. Tuesday, 16 August, 2011 at 12:23 AM

    I think it’s a good idea. Non-Military National Citizen Service is not a punishment at all. In my opinion, it would serve to strengthen the feeling of involvement as a citizen, and also a place in society as part of the group. Discipline is also good, and I think it would be a useful measure which would help boost respect and responsibility among future young people.

    But there are other things too that need to be addressed. For example, there appears to be a certain degree of misunderstanding between some communities and the police, and they need to be repaired. In addition, I think that young people need to be made aware of their reponsibilities as a citizen in an effective and practical way. The government should also make an effort to reduce feelings of an ‘us’ and ‘them’ division between professional politicians and ordinary citizens.

  3. MysteryIdiot
    Tuesday, 16 August, 2011 at 8:04 AM

    I’m not totally against it, but there are plenty of vey well behaved 16 year olds who have worked hard at school and want to move on to A-levels and then university, before swiftly moving into the workforce to pay off all the debts they will have incurred on the way.

    9 months in a structured program will give them an appreciation of what shitty jobs and tasks are like, and that may be beneficial, but in terms of their careers and aspirations they will just be treading water. I can see the really wealthy sending their kids to international schools abroad for those years.

  4. Tuesday, 16 August, 2011 at 1:28 PM

    It should be national service 1950’s style for all children that do not enter further education and see their courses through to the end. This country needs disciple and morals taught from an early age. 1950’s education catered for every child at different levels by teaching them how to run a home, family and apprenticeships for industries which are now short staffed such as carpentry, brick laying, plastering etc.. All children of both sexes need to learn how to manage money, write letters for job application and have interview training. The brighter pupils did the more fundamental exams and went on to college and university to become our Doctors, Lawyers, and Accountants. These options should not be based on how much money you have to pay for education but on the individuals ABILITY.
    If David Cameron does as he proposes I Will vote for him in the next election. It’s about time someone realised that the PC brigade, health and safety overkill and Brussels! have demoralised and ruined this great country.

  1. No trackbacks yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: